backup/EWF
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Tried to reduce gap between both EWSGI proposals

Browse Source 
Re-adapt the Spec-compliant solution (instead of Lib-compliant solution).
  Thus no more 100% deferred interface.
Rename EWSGI_RESPONSE into EWSGI_RESPONSE_BUFFER
Added in extra/response-as-result/  an copy/paste from the implementation of Paul's proposal (not up to date with Paul's spec). But this is mainly for information and tests.
Removed part of the ewsgi/specification interfaces ... to be able to test EWSGI compliant library against the pure specification (experimental).
Renamed most of the GW_... into EWSGI_...
This commit is contained in:
Jocelyn Fiat
2011-08-01 16:41:16 +02:00
parent bbcc9ef44b
commit 4eb22d0272
61 changed files with 1570 additions and 534 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
library/server/request/router/src/handler/request_agent_handler.e
View File

@@ -23,11 +23,11 @@ feature -- Initialization
feature -- Access
action: PROCEDURE [ANY, TUPLE [ctx: REQUEST_HANDLER_CONTEXT; req: EWSGI_REQUEST; res: EWSGI_RESPONSE_STREAM]]
action: PROCEDURE [ANY, TUPLE [ctx: REQUEST_HANDLER_CONTEXT; req: EWSGI_REQUEST; res: EWSGI_RESPONSE_BUFFER]]
feature -- Execution
execute_application (ctx: REQUEST_HANDLER_CONTEXT; req: EWSGI_REQUEST; res: EWSGI_RESPONSE_STREAM)
execute_application (ctx: REQUEST_HANDLER_CONTEXT; req: EWSGI_REQUEST; res: EWSGI_RESPONSE_BUFFER)
do
action.call ([ctx, req, res])
end