Tried to reduce gap between both EWSGI proposals
Re-adapt the Spec-compliant solution (instead of Lib-compliant solution). Thus no more 100% deferred interface. Rename EWSGI_RESPONSE into EWSGI_RESPONSE_BUFFER Added in extra/response-as-result/ an copy/paste from the implementation of Paul's proposal (not up to date with Paul's spec). But this is mainly for information and tests. Removed part of the ewsgi/specification interfaces ... to be able to test EWSGI compliant library against the pure specification (experimental). Renamed most of the GW_... into EWSGI_...
This commit is contained in:
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ feature -- Setup
|
||||
|
||||
feature -- Execution
|
||||
|
||||
execute (req: EWSGI_REQUEST; res: EWSGI_RESPONSE_STREAM)
|
||||
execute (req: EWSGI_REQUEST; res: EWSGI_RESPONSE_BUFFER)
|
||||
do
|
||||
if attached router.dispatch (req, res) as r then
|
||||
--| done
|
||||
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ feature -- Execution
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
execute_default (req: EWSGI_REQUEST; res: EWSGI_RESPONSE_STREAM)
|
||||
execute_default (req: EWSGI_REQUEST; res: EWSGI_RESPONSE_BUFFER)
|
||||
deferred
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user