diff --git a/EWSGI.md b/EWSGI.md
index 95dc00d7..ae0d35da 100644
--- a/EWSGI.md
+++ b/EWSGI.md
@@ -3,14 +3,52 @@
 - And below the various calls for decisions, and effective decisions
 
 
-### return type of parameter (and similar) should be deferred WGI_VALUE
-* Description: Instead of returning READABLE_STRING_32 , it would be better to use **WGI_VALUE** .
- This allows to have various types such as WGI_STRING_VALUE, WGI_LIST_VALUE, WGI_TABLE_VALUE, WGI_FILE_VALUE .
+# In progress
 
-* Status: proposed on 2011-09-05.
-* **WAITING FOR APPROVAL**
+### Return type of `parameter' (and similar query_, form_data_ ...) should be deferred WGI_VALUE
+- Code: **P-2011-09-05-WGI_VALUE**
+- Status: proposed on 2011-09-05.
+- **WAITING FOR APPROVAL**
 
-### <strike>change prefix from EWSGI_ to WGI_ </strike>
-* Description: shorter and pronouncable prefix
-* Status: **adopted**
-* Decision: **WGI_**
+> Instead of returning just `READABLE_STRING_32` , it would be better to use **WGI_VALUE** .  
+> Mainly to address the multiple value for the same param name, but also for uploaded files.  
+> This allows to have various types such as WGI_STRING_VALUE, WGI_LIST_VALUE, WGI_TABLE_VALUE, WGI_FILE_VALUE .  
+>   
+> Thus we would have: <code>parameter (a_name: READABLE_STRING_GENERAL): detachable WGI_VALUE </code>  
+
+### Include the parameter's name in WGI_VALUE interface
+- Code: **P-2011-09-05-WGI_VALUE_interface**
+- Dependence: adoption of P-2011-09-05-WGI_VALUE , may impact on P-2011-09-05-parameters_ITERABLE
+- Status: proposed on 2011-09-05 **WAITING FOR APPROVAL**
+
+> include the corresponding parameter's name in WGI_VALUE interface.  
+> Such as `{WGI_VALUE}.name: READABLE_STRING_GENERAL`  (or READABLE_STRING_32).   
+>  
+> This would also allow a nicer signature for `parameters: ITERABLE [WGI__VALUE]'  
+> instead of `parameters: ITERABLE [TUPLE [name: READABLE_STRING_GENERAL; value: WGI__VALUE]]'  
+
+### Signature of parameters (and similar) using ITERABLE [...]
+- Code: **P-2011-09-05-parameters_ITERABLE**
+- Status: proposed on 2011-09-05 **WAITING FOR APPROVAL**
+
+> Description: Instead of forcing the implementation to use HASH_TABLE, DS_HASH_TABLE, DS_HASH_SET, ... or similar 
+> we should use `ITERABLE`
+> 
+> `parameters: ITERABLE [TUPLE [name: READABLE_STRING_GENERAL; value: WGI_VALUE]]`   
+>  
+>  Or, if `P-2011-09-05-WGI_VALUE_interface` is adopted  (WGI_VALUE.name holds the related parameter's name)  
+>  
+> `parameters: ITERABLE [WGI_VALUE]`  
+
+# Adopted entries
+
+### Change prefix from EWSGI_ to WGI_ 
+- Code: **P-2011-08-29-WGI_prefix**
+- Status: **adopted**
+- Decision: **WGI_**
+
+> shorter and pronouncable prefix for EWSGI class names
+
+# Rejected entries
+
+...