mirrors/EWF
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Updated EWSGI (markdown)

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
jocelyn
2011-09-26 07:53:32 -07:00
parent beb721ed4b
commit aaf8af85fd
1 changed files with 8 additions and 7 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

15
EWSGI.md
View File

@@ -12,9 +12,13 @@
> Include WGI_HEADERS to help the user to build HTTP Header. > Include WGI_HEADERS to help the user to build HTTP Header.
> So that he doesn't have to know the HTTP specification for usual needs > So that he doesn't have to know the HTTP specification for usual needs
----
# Adopted entries
## Rename `parameter` into `item` ## Rename `parameter` into `item`
- Code: **P-2011-09-07-renaming_REQUEST_item** - Code: **P-2011-09-07-renaming_REQUEST_item**
- Status: proposed on 2011-09-07 **WAITING FOR APPROVAL** - Status: proposed on 2011-09-07 **ADOPTED-by-default**
> rename `{REQUEST}.parameter (n: READABLE_STRING_GENERAL): detachable WGI_VALUE` > rename `{REQUEST}.parameter (n: READABLE_STRING_GENERAL): detachable WGI_VALUE`
> into `{REQUEST}.item (n: READABLE_STRING_GENERAL): detachable WGI_VALUE` > into `{REQUEST}.item (n: READABLE_STRING_GENERAL): detachable WGI_VALUE`
@@ -22,7 +26,7 @@
## Return type of `parameter' (and similar query_, form_data_ ...) should be deferred WGI_VALUE ## Return type of `parameter' (and similar query_, form_data_ ...) should be deferred WGI_VALUE
- Code: **P-2011-09-05-WGI_VALUE** - Code: **P-2011-09-05-WGI_VALUE**
- Status: proposed on 2011-09-05 **WAITING FOR APPROVAL** - Status: proposed on 2011-09-05 **ADOPTED-by-default**
> Instead of returning just `READABLE_STRING_32` , it would be better to use **WGI_VALUE** . > Instead of returning just `READABLE_STRING_32` , it would be better to use **WGI_VALUE** .
> Mainly to address the multiple value for the same param name, but also for uploaded files. > Mainly to address the multiple value for the same param name, but also for uploaded files.
@@ -33,7 +37,7 @@
## Include the parameter's name in WGI_VALUE interface ## Include the parameter's name in WGI_VALUE interface
- Code: **P-2011-09-05-WGI_VALUE_interface** - Code: **P-2011-09-05-WGI_VALUE_interface**
- Dependence: adoption of P-2011-09-05-WGI_VALUE , may impact on P-2011-09-05-parameters_ITERABLE - Dependence: adoption of P-2011-09-05-WGI_VALUE , may impact on P-2011-09-05-parameters_ITERABLE
- Status: proposed on 2011-09-05 **WAITING FOR APPROVAL** - Status: proposed on 2011-09-05 **ADOPTED-by-default**
> include the corresponding parameter's name in WGI_VALUE interface. > include the corresponding parameter's name in WGI_VALUE interface.
> Such as `{WGI_VALUE}.name: READABLE_STRING_GENERAL` (or READABLE_STRING_32). > Such as `{WGI_VALUE}.name: READABLE_STRING_GENERAL` (or READABLE_STRING_32).
@@ -44,7 +48,7 @@
## Signature of parameters (and similar) using ITERABLE [...] ## Signature of parameters (and similar) using ITERABLE [...]
- Code: **P-2011-09-05-parameters_ITERABLE** - Code: **P-2011-09-05-parameters_ITERABLE**
- Status: proposed on 2011-09-05 **WAITING FOR APPROVAL** - Status: proposed on 2011-09-05 **ADOPTED-by-default**
> Description: Instead of forcing the implementation to use HASH_TABLE, DS_HASH_TABLE, DS_HASH_SET, ... or similar > Description: Instead of forcing the implementation to use HASH_TABLE, DS_HASH_TABLE, DS_HASH_SET, ... or similar
> we should use `ITERABLE` > we should use `ITERABLE`
@@ -55,9 +59,6 @@
> >
> `parameters: ITERABLE [WGI_VALUE]` > `parameters: ITERABLE [WGI_VALUE]`
----
# Adopted entries
## Change prefix from EWSGI_ to WGI_ ## Change prefix from EWSGI_ to WGI_
- Code: **P-2011-08-29-WGI_prefix** - Code: **P-2011-08-29-WGI_prefix**
- Status: **adopted** - Status: **adopted**