From 82b45bfd11b28e5295212d4f7e5f96435162817c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: halw Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:16:37 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Initiative to replace "Eiffel language" and similar with "Eiffel programming language" Author:halw Date:2012-08-20T13:16:37.000000Z git-svn-id: https://svn.eiffel.com/eiffel-org/trunk@1131 abb3cda0-5349-4a8f-a601-0c33ac3a8c38 --- .../current/method/eiffel-tutorial-et/et-hello-world.wiki | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/documentation/current/method/eiffel-tutorial-et/et-hello-world.wiki b/documentation/current/method/eiffel-tutorial-et/et-hello-world.wiki index 58b43897..ca3520c1 100644 --- a/documentation/current/method/eiffel-tutorial-et/et-hello-world.wiki +++ b/documentation/current/method/eiffel-tutorial-et/et-hello-world.wiki @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ The body of the feature is introduced by the do keyword and termina * put_string outputs a string, passed as argument, here "Hello World". * put_new_line terminates the line. -Rather than using a call to put_new_line, the first version of the class simply includes a new-line character, denoted as %N (the percent sign is used to introduce codes for [[Eiffel language syntax#Special characters|special characters]]), at the end of the string. Either technique is acceptable. +Rather than using a call to put_new_line, the first version of the class simply includes a new-line character, denoted as %N (the percent sign is used to introduce codes for [[Eiffel programming language syntax#Special characters|special characters]]), at the end of the string. Either technique is acceptable. You may have noticed another difference between the two versions. The first version uses a call to print where the second uses io.put_string . Here too, the effect is identical and either technique is acceptable. In the next section, you will begin to see how things like io and print become available for use in a class like HELLO.