mirror of
https://github.com/EiffelSoftware/eiffel-org.git
synced 2025-12-07 07:12:25 +01:00
5c23b7c968
git-svn-id: https://svn.eiffel.com/eiffel-org/trunk@2152 abb3cda0-5349-4a8f-a601-0c33ac3a8c38
24 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
24 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
[[Property:link_title|Void-safe programming]]
|
|
[[Property:title|Void-safe programming in Eiffel]]
|
|
[[Property:weight|10]]
|
|
[[Property:uuid|a03568e8-eb79-70d7-04a3-6fd3ed7ac2b3]]
|
|
=Void-safe software development using Eiffel: introduction=
|
|
|
|
When you develop software in Eiffel, you can be assured (at compile time) that your system will not attempt (at run time) to apply a feature to a void reference -- or, in the terminology of other languages such as C, "dereference a null pointer".
|
|
|
|
Throughout the history of Eiffel, new capabilities -- agents, the SCOOP concurrency mechanism and many others -- have added considerable expressive power to the languag,e while causing minimum impact on existing software. Void-safe Eiffel is such an innovation, which instead of adding new mechanisms ''removes'' a major source of instability in programs, present in all other major languages: null-pointer dereferencing. To say that Eiffel is void-safe means that such catastrophic yet common errors simply will not occur.
|
|
|
|
There is in fact no need to speak of "void-safe Eiffel". The language is just Eiffel... and it is void-safe, just as it is statically typed. We still occasionally refer to "Void-safe Eiffel" simply because until 2005 or so Eiffel was not void-safe (it had to start somewhere), and you may still encounter older documentation that talks about "calls on void targets" (null-pointer dereferences). But in today's Eiffel such an event is impossible.
|
|
|
|
The rest of this chapter explains void safety:
|
|
|
|
# How is void-safety defined?
|
|
# What are the specific elements of the mechanism?
|
|
# How do these relate to Eiffel before void-safety?
|
|
# What do I need to know to produce standard Eiffel software?
|
|
# What do I need to know to convert my existing systems to be standard?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|